Differences between uniform initialization and direct initialization in C++

24 Oct 2023

In C++, there are two ways to initialize objects: uniform initialization and direct initialization. While both methods allow you to initialize objects, there are some key differences between them. In this blog post, we will explore these differences and understand when to use each method.

Direct Initialization

Direct initialization has been a part of C++ since its early versions. It involves using parentheses or the equal sign to initialize an object. Here’s an example:

int x(5); // using parentheses
int y = 10; // using the equal sign

In direct initialization, the compiler searches for constructors that match the provided arguments and initializes the object accordingly. If no exact match is found, the compiler tries to perform implicit conversions to find a suitable constructor.

Direct initialization also allows for the use of explicit constructor calls, which can be useful in certain scenarios. For example:

class MyClass {
public:
    explicit MyClass(int value) {
        // constructor implementation
    }
};

int main() {
    MyClass obj = MyClass(5); // explicit constructor call
    return 0;
}

Uniform Initialization

Introduced in C++11, uniform initialization provides a more consistent and intuitive way to initialize objects. It uses braces ({}) to enclose the initialization values. Here’s an example:

int x{5}; // using braces
int y = {10}; // using the equal sign with braces

Uniform initialization has several advantages over direct initialization:

Prevents narrowing conversions: Uniform initialization disallows narrowing conversions, which are potentially dangerous. For example, int x = 4.2; is allowed in direct initialization but not in uniform initialization.
Consistency: Uniform initialization can be used in a variety of contexts, including initializing class members, arrays, and containers, providing a more consistent syntax.
Avoids most vexing parse: Uniform initialization eliminates the most vexing parse, a situation where parentheses around an empty argument list is mistakenly interpreted as a function declaration.

Uniform initialization also allows for initializer_list constructors, which can be used to conveniently initialize objects with a list of values.

class MyClass {
public:
    MyClass(std::initializer_list<int> values) {
        // constructor implementation
    }
};

int main() {
    MyClass obj = {1, 2, 3}; // initializer_list constructor
    return 0;
}

Conclusion

Both direct initialization and uniform initialization have their uses in C++, and the choice between them depends on the specific requirements of the situation. Direct initialization is more flexible and allows for explicit constructor calls, while uniform initialization provides a more consistent and safer way to initialize objects. By understanding the differences between these two methods, you can make informed decisions when initializing objects in your C++ code.

References: